Category: 

Are Movies Better Than Live Theater?

Article Details
  • Written By: Jessica Ellis
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 30 October 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Although they mainly functioned as downspouts, gargoyles were also intended to scare people into attending church.  more...

December 3 ,  1989 :  The Cold War officially ended.  more...

A constant debate between fans of both art forms is whether movies are better than live theater. Some consider theater productions to be outdated and out-stripped by the technological capabilities of film. Others believe that film is too often a sell-out, pawning substandard plots and writing through excessive special effects and gimmicks to draw a crowd. Yet both forms have the ability to attain astounding levels of quality and to affect their audience on an intensely personal level, although using different methods.

Live theater has an air of controlled chaos about it that is impossible to replicate. Each performance will be subtly different, depending on a variety of factors. Expert actors are able to assess the overall mood of their audience and adjust their performance accordingly. However, if the audience is difficult to read or finds the subject matter offensive, an otherwise excellent production can be dragged through a terrible night.

It is precisely this uncertainty that makes theater appealing to many. The audience can be drawn in simply through the recognition that they are not watching a recorded performance but live people. The more emotionally involved the audience becomes, the more the actors can play off the atmosphere they are receiving. Actors frequently mention the dead silence that can fill a theater during a heightened moment of drama, which lets them know that the audience is raptly attending the action.

Ad

Film, in many ways, is a safer medium. Performances are recorded and a single line or scene may be filmed ten or fifteen times. The work then gets further review and selection in the editing process, allowing the editor and director to choose the best versions that complement the whole of the film. While this removes the element of spontaneity, it also can ensure a well-balanced film free of technical or acting mishaps. If an actor misses a line, they can simply start over.

The greatest advantage film has over live theater is technological. Because audiences have to suspend their disbelief less in film, they can more easily become immersed in the world on screen. With surround sound, computer generated images, and carefully selected musical tracks, a lusher and more believable world can be created on screen. Additionally, some styles of filming and even individual film shots can be used to create a more intimate environment and put the audience right in the action.

The limitations of the stage can be disastrous, but can also be freeing. By not needing to concentrate on fully realized or even fully realistic settings, the director, playwright and cast can concentrate better on the plot and characters. Badly written and acted films are often excused by great special effects; badly acted plays almost never are given positive reviews based on production value.

Whether you prefer film or live theater is truly a matter of personal taste. For any enthusiast of performing arts, both genres can offer a wealth of sweeping experiences. Individuals may try to tell you that one is demonstrably better than the other, but the truth is they are two titans of artistic expression, guided and aided by one another.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

anon969377
Post 7

People who think theatre is inferior to anything on screen have simply been in far too many bad theatre productions. Just as someone who walks into a bad movie may think "what's the big deal about movies?" The fact is, theatre is the heart. The magic created right there is not diluted by a camera. You, the audience, see it first. You experience it. There's nothing like being at the beach verses watching it on screen.

A great production and the magic it createscannot be replaced by technology. Who are we as human beings to think it can be? I suppose talking on the phone is preferable to talking to people in person nowadays.

anon336863
Post 6

I go to a lot more movies, but plays are great in their own way since they are simple and make more of an effort.

summing
Post 5
My wife loves to go to the theater, but I just can't get into it. I have tried, and I do not hate going, but I would prefer a movie, just about any movie, over a play any day.

Movies suck you in so much more. You totally forget that you are sitting in a theater. When I see a play I can never forget that. I feel like I'm always checking my watch and peeking at the exits.

But like I say, my wife loves it. So I have a feeling that I will be sitting through at least a few more plays.

chivebasil
Post 4

I know a lot of people who would say that yes, movies are better than live theater. But I have seen a number of stage productions that rival anything I have seen on a screen, big or small.

If it is a good production with good, actors, a good director, and an ambitious production designer it can be a remarkably immersive and transfixing experience. You just have to keep an open mind and find a play that interests you.

anon25331
Post 2

What was the very first movie ever made?

anon18555
Post 1

why can't the theater launch an artist career?

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email