Category: 

What are the Different Types of Jazz Music?

Jazz styles range from New Orleans Dixieland and ragtime, to bop and fusion.
Rhythm sections often include a guitar.
Article Details
  • Written By: Matthew F.
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 07 April 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
According to popular legend, Emperor Nero fiddled while Rome burned.   more...

April 18 ,  1775 :  Paul Revere went on his famous nighttime ride.  more...

Jazz music is an art of improvisation. It is a combination of improvisation, swing notes, back beats, and blues with brass instruments. These ingredients have combined in different ways, with different factors, to make different types of jazz. From Dixieland to Chicago style to swing and soul, the different types all meet at one confluence.

Among the most popular and earliest forms was New Orleans Dixieland jazz. This genre, in the city credited with birthing the jazz tradition, is the source of many standards, such as “When the Saints Go Marching In.” Dixieland Jazz dominated the scene in the early part of the 20th century, from about 1918-1928. It was known for its ragtime sound, which was played over a rhythm section, unusual for jazz shows. The rhythm sections often included guitars, banjos and drums. New Orleans Dixieland had a northern counterpart in Chicago style jazz, which implemented a faster pace to this form of rhythmic jazz.

Swing dominated in the 1930s and through World War II. This genre was the main form of American popular music for much of this time and introduced the United States to exuberant big bands and band leaders. The genre was named for the strong swing notes played in the unique jazz style, in which a first note in a rhythm was extended over a second note and improvised.

Ad

Bop was the next big jazz music movement in the mid 1940s through to the 1960s. This style was an up-tempo jazz insistent on harmony. It spawned legends such as Dizzy Gillespie, Charlie Parker, and Thelonious Monk. Bop, to many listeners, sounded incomplete and rushed and led to a new revolution in the jazz movement with intricate melodies.

Cool Jazz followed in the 1950s and '60s, and was known for its easy tone. It avoided the abstractness of bop and incorporated Miles Davis into the musical lexicon. Free Jazz was different response to the tumult of bop. It answered with another abstract form, using less composition, and introduced the world to John Coltrane. Latin jazz and soul jazz would also emerge in the following years and would bring the jazz sound to an audience never before reached.

Jazz fusion was introduced in the early 1970s and melded with rock at a time when that genre was reaching its zenith. With performers like Herbie Hancock and Frank Zappa, jazz fusion spelled a more mainstream approach. In the years that followed, leading up to the beginning of the 21st century, jazz would see itself further transform in other subgenres with the advent of pop fusion.

These genres, along with countless other minor movements in jazz, have spelled a century-long love affair by American musicians to a form of music that is uniquely American. Like America, jazz music is diverse and free, with many different types and styles.

Ad

Discuss this Article

anon152894
Post 7

Love all sorts of jazz, since the early beginnings to what it finally became techno!

anon129164
Post 6

I got tired of country and pop and rock and even a lot of blues. Now all I listen to is jazz, with a bit of blues thrown in. I love the earlier forms of jazz, ragtime, dixieland, swing. Not just the earlier performers but also the current performers who do those types of music.

Dizzy Gillespie and Charlie Parker may have been geniuses, but I have not yet learned to appreciate much of their music, I don't like what they did to jazz, and I don't like any jazz without a pretty obvious melody. Give me Duke Ellington and Benny Goodman and their ilk and I'll be happy. For now, anyway, and likely for a long time.

StreamFinder
Post 5

I know some people may disagree with me, but for me, 1930s jazz music is what it's all about.

I mean, how can you compare anybody to the great swingers that came about during that time, you know, Duke Ellington, Glenn Miller, Benny Goodman, and of course Django Reinhardt.

One of the most underappreciated jazz artists came out of the 1930s too -- Artie Shaw. He may not have the same name recognition as some other players, but the things that man could do with a clarinet -- just awesome.

Now that's some music that I would actually buy -- jazz music should make a comeback and kick out all this modern computerized stuff.

googlefanz
Post 4

Are there any good places to find 1940s jazz sheet music online?

My church choir is doing an "old-timey" series, and we'd really love to get some of that old, New Orleans-style gospel jazz music -- the kind that really had a kick, not the synthesized stuff.

Anybody know of a good supplier?

EarlyForest
Post 3

I really love jazz music, especially the really classic 1920s jazz music, like King Oliver and Bessie Smith. The really early Louis Armstrong is great too, although he's always great.

For me, there's nothing better than live jazz though -- music is meant to be experienced first hand, not through some cleaned up, synthesized, audio engineered process.

I say bring back the days of free, live jazz music in bars, and let's get rid of this elevator music nonsense that people tend to play in the background now.

Give me some good, smooth, live jazz -- that's music, pure and simple, and as it should be.

klow
Post 2

It's too bad that jazz fusion developed as it did. It really started off as a form of jazz music that incorporated instrumentation popular in 1960's rock and roll. Albums such as Miles Davis's "Bitches Brew" and "In A Silent Way" combined the subtlety and mood of jazz with the timbre and rhythms of rock. By the mid-1970's and into the 80's, fusion really became excessive. Musicians often used the genre to play dazzling solos but with, in my opinion, little of the subtlety and emotion of older jazz music. In the early 80's, fusion musicians used the newly developed synthesizers in a way that I just find to be cheesy in a modern context. I also think that fusion in many ways contributed to a defamation of jazz among the younger generations nowadays, and it's really too bad.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email