Category: 

What Is a Motion to Suppress Evidence?

A motion to suppress evidence may be requested in a criminal case if evidence was obtained through an illegal search.
A motion to suppress evidence may be sought in court by an attorney if evidence was recovered by police as the result of illegal questioning.
Evidence cannot be presented during a trial if a motion to supress is granted.
In the US, the Fourth Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.
If a motion to suppress evidence is granted, a judge cannot use the evidence to make a decision about a case.
Article Details
  • Originally Written By: Alexis W.
  • Revised By: C. Mitchell
  • Edited By: C. Wilborn
  • Images By: Oocoskun, Donserhio, Shawn Hempel, Tex Hex, Apops
  • Last Modified Date: 12 September 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Extremely hot chili peppers can produce a very mild hallucinogenic effect.  more...

September 21 ,  1939 :  US President Franklin D. Roosevelt urged Congress to repeal the Neutrality Acts.  more...

A motion to suppress evidence is a legal tool that attorneys and parties to a litigation can use to stop certain information from being presented or even discussed during a criminal or civil trial. It’s most commonly used in the context of the U.S. legal system, but many different countries have something similar. In most places this sort of request is a written filing that outlines two primary things: first, a concise statement of the evidence that should be excluded, and second, a reason why. There usually has to be some legal reason why the information should be left out of the official record. Improper evidence collection, like if the information only came to the police or the prosecutors through an illegal search, is a common example; evidence that was collected in such a way as to violate a person’s protected right to privacy is another. When one of these sorts of motions is granted, the information is not presented during trial, not included in the official record of the case, and cannot be considered by the judge or jury when rendering a judgment.

Ad

How It’s Requested

Each jurisdiction typically has its own specific filing procedure for this sort of motion, but in general it’s a paper document that must be formally submitted to the court within a certain window of time after the case has been officially opened. It must describe the challenged evidence completely and in detail, and must also set out specific reasons why that evidence shouldn’t be allowed in. These reasons usually have to be grounded in the law; simply claiming that they’re harmful, redundant, or irrelevant isn’t typically enough. It’s common to cite other cases that have granted motions for similar reasons or on similar grounds, though this isn’t often required.

Once the court receives the motion, the judge will typically set up a hearing to discuss it. Both sides are usually invited to make comments about why the evidence should or should not be considered. This is often a really important chance for the parties to elaborate on the ideas set out in the motion.

Consequences for Trial

When a motion to suppress evidence is granted, neither the judge nor the jury can make a decision about the case based on the suppressed evidence. It’s removed from the record and isn’t introduced or presented at trial at all. Sometimes this simply weakens a case, but depending on what the evidence was it can also more or less destroy it. For example, if a person is being charged with possession of illegal drugs but the drugs themselves are the evidence that’s been excluded, there isn’t really much to go on at trial. In these instances the case is usually dismissed.

Reasons and Legal Bases

Whether a motion to suppress evidence will be granted depends a lot on the strength of the legal reasoning behind the request. Most of the time, there needs to be some procedural problem with how the evidence was collected or the circumstances surrounding that collection. Claims that the evidence is harmful or “unfair,” while potentially true, aren’t usually enough. At least in the United States, the two biggest reasons material is excluded are related to privacy violations, and usually arise in the context of illegal searches and seizures and improper collection methodology.

Illegal Searches

In the United States, the legal system weighs each person's constitutional right to privacy against the public interest in prosecuting crimes and enforcing public laws. Various rules and constitutional rights are in place to protect citizens' privacy and to prevent unlawful investigations. If a law enforcement organization violates one of these privacy laws and rules, evidence is considered to be improperly collected. When evidence is improperly obtained, such as through an illegal search, the party can file a motion to suppress it.

The Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure, is often the basis for these sorts of claims. This Amendment holds that a person and his property cannot be searched without reasonable cause. A warrant is generally required, unless illegal items are in plain sight or the police or law enforcement personnel actually witness a crime being committed.

Improper Communication

The Fifth Amendment is also designed to protect a person's privacy. It guarantees a person the right to remain silent and the right to avoid self incrimination. Under a Supreme Court case called Miranda v. Arizona, the police must inform a suspected criminal of this right — as well as of his right to an attorney — before questioning. If this procedure isn’t followed, any verbal evidence can be excluded or suppressed. This is perhaps most significant when it comes to confessions and other statements that are directly incriminating.

In most instances, any additional evidence that police recover as the direct result of an illegal search or illegal questioning is also inadmissible, even if there isn’t anything technically wrong with the procedures or methodology used. This evidence is considered "fruit of the poison tree." For example, if the police recover a gun only because the criminal told them where the gun was during the course of an illegally obtained confession, the gun is also improperly obtained evidence and can be suppressed.

Ad

More from Wisegeek

You might also Like

Discuss this Article

anon298340
Post 8

Where online can I find forms to print out for an Illinois motion in limine, motion for new counsel and motion for post-sentence relief?

skottyb601
Post 7

I'd like to ask what forms need to be filled out to send to a judge? My son was arrested for supposedly selling drugs to an undercover cop, not once but twice. He's in county jail right now and has been there for four months. His court appointed attorney has yet to visit him one time. His case keeps getting court dates, and all have had "Pass Slips" on all of them.

From my understanding, my son's girlfriend has talked to another attorney, and he says that there isn't sufficient evidence against him. My son keeps asking me if I could file a "Motion to Discover Evidence," a "Motion to Suppress Evidence," "Motion to a Speedy Trial" and "Motion to Quash Enhancement". I understand none of this.

Can someone give me some kind of information? To my knowledge, the selling to an undercover cop is false because he was out of town at the time it was supposed to have happened.

anon283854
Post 6

The police told my son that his plates belonged to someone they were looking for for skipping out on court dates. This was wrong because I went with my son to get the plates at the DMV and put them on myself. The police were mistaken, or it was a bluff.

They asked my son to allow a search of his car. He said no. So they held him because he was 'nervous' acting. No kidding. My son has schizoaffective and bipolar disorders, and has occasional panic attacks. Police make him very nervous. He did well to hold it together during this ordeal.

About 20 minutes later the K-9 unit arrived, and the dog barked. They searched and found a small amount of marijuana. They gave him a minor misdemeanor ticket. But the search still seemed illegal.

anon277540
Post 5

I wonder, what type of “illegal” evidence is actually allowed to be presented in court?

anon270065
Post 4

Well written and better explained than in my text book. It did not take two chapters to get the answer I was looking for. I loved the fact that it was short and simple and to the point and used plain english.

yournamehere
Post 3

What exactly is a motion affidavit as it relates to suppressing trial evidence? I saw that on a website that also offered motion to suppress evidence forms, but I didn't know if I needed to fill out a motion to suppress evidence form and a motion affidavit, or if I was ok with just one.

Thanks!

EarlyForest
Post 2

Did you know that there are actually a lot of things that you can file for a motion to suppress with a DUI?

For example, you can file a motion to suppress evidence on the grounds that you were stopped unconstitutionally, or on the grounds that there was an unconstitutional search and seizure.

Also, be sure to seek a judgment motion if the police failed to read you your Miranda rights when they should have -- that can really help you out in a case like this.

zenmaster
Post 1

Can somebody give me a good motion to suppress evidence example? My daughter is asking me all these questions about criminal defense law for her civics class, and not being a criminal law attorney, there's only so much I can do.

Can you give me a sample of a motion to supress evidence, or at least a clear example?

Thank!

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email