Category: 

Which US States Do Not Require Seatbelts?

South Dakota is one of five states that do not require people to wear seatbelts.
Seatbelts are not required to be worn in all states of the United States.
Some states are pushing for seatbelts to be required in school buses and public transportation.
Article Details
  • Written By: Tricia Ellis-Christensen
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 23 March 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
A 2003 blackout affected 50 million people in North America and had an economic impact of about $10 billion USD.  more...

April 23 ,  :  William Shakespeare was born and died. (1564, 1616)  more...

Despite significant evidence that wearing a seatbelt dramatically reduces risk of fatality in car crashes, some states still do not require seatbelts and don’t have seatbelt laws. All states since 1985 do have laws requiring the use of infant seats and car seats for young children, but some don't enforce any type of seatbelt legislation. The following states do not require seatbelts: South Dakota, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Maine and Kentucky. Relatedly, some states do not require motorcycle helmets: Colorado, Illinois and Iowa.

For some, it may be difficult to understand the arguments of states without seatbelt laws. Essentially, the argument of such states comes down not to a dispute as to whether it’s safer to use seatbelts, but instead the reasoning tends to hinge on the concept of free choice. Some citizens are concerned that requiring seatbelts infringes on personal freedom and that the states that do not require seatbelts are merely asserting the rights of individual citizens to make their own choices. Those who argue against requiring seatbelts may say that sometimes personal responsibility has to be legislated in order to protect citizens.

Statistics show that the fatality rates in car accidents are highest on rural roads in the states that don't make drivers and passengers to wear their seatbelts. In contrast, accident fatality rates are lower in states that require strapping oneself in with a seatbelt. Still, many people ignore seatbelt laws, potentially making enforcement of seatbelt laws difficult to enforce.

Ad

Supporters of seatbelt laws may be concerned not only with seatbelt laws affecting passenger cars but school buses and public transportation as well. Policies affecting these modes of transportation is changing in many states which are moving towards the requirement that new buses feature seatbelts and that student passengers buckle up. For some parents, this change isn't occurring fast enough. Hesitation on the issue may be less about personal freedom and more about simple economics — installing seat belts on buses can be costly. Many parents counter, however, that there is no expense too great where the lives of children are concerned.

Ad

Discuss this Article

anon930001
Post 15

How many people die in accidents within states because they don't wear seatbelts, compared the deaths rates in a state which require seatbelts?

anon261391
Post 13

Delaware requires you have the helmet on your motorcycle, but not on you.

anon230671
Post 12

Kentucky requires seat belts, and Illinois requires motorcycle helmets.

anon193107
Post 11

*Insert Big Brother government here as thick as honey and not as sweet tasting.*

Enjoy the modern world where the government makes choices for you, making you think you don't have to be responsible for yourself like the "1984" book.

Remember people: If you have a personal safety problem, always blame the government and get them to pass new laws. New laws are always the answer.

Do not, I repeat, do not make citizens responsible for their own safety flaws as that will cause people to think for themselves and vote how they want, not what your as a government body wants.

*Insert post drooling thick with sarcasm here.*

anon168162
Post 10

The reason for such prevalent seat belt "laws" (statutes) is not safety, it's money. The money is for states while protecting private interests (auto insurance industry). It's no simpler than that as government does not exist to protect you from your own choices.

anon97353
Post 9

SD has a secondary seatbelt law for the front seat.

anon88540
Post 8

Maine and Mass require seatbelts.

anon86998
Post 7

Seat belts should be mandatory on motorcycles. That way all the blood and guts would congregate in one area instead of all over the neighborhood. Car fatalities are a good example because the dead person usually is already coffinized.

anon79456
Post 6

Well, I live in New Hampshire and I know you do not have to wear a helmet on a motorcycle. Second, Mass does have a seat belt law. Site should do its homework.

anon53333
Post 5

What about good ole Texas. 200.00 front or back. They'll screw you either way. lol

anon17592
Post 2

I know Kentucky has laws that make not using seatbelts a primary offense.

malena
Post 1

I was surprised when I first heard about this. I knew seat belts were not required in some countries, but somehow I had assumed that seatbelt laws were national -- governed by federal, not state law. Turns out it's governed by individual states and as a result those states that do require people to buckle have different seat belt laws. For example, some states apply their seatbelt laws to riders as young as 6 years old where other state seatbelt laws don't kick in until a rider or driver is at least 18 years old. Another difference is that some states apply their laws to drivers only or both drivers and riders. Some states have primary seatbelt laws which means that law enforcement can ticket drivers and passengers just for not wearing a seat belt, while other states have secondary seat belt laws, which means that the police may ticket for seat belt violations only after stopping the car for violating another traffic infraction. Finally, states differ in the area of how much they fine for violations. The state of Washington seems to be the most strict allowing up to a $124 fine for first time offenders -- perhaps not such a shock since Washington is a pretty liberal state!

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email